Jump to content


Where classical school and homeschool teachers talk.



Discussion Starts Here.

For the Children's Sake.

Learn from Others.

Add Your Voice to the Conversation.

Glad You Are Here.

Give Us Your Question.

Sign in to follow this  
Anne Rowland

question from text p. 54

Recommended Posts


On p. 54 the text refers to "the concupiscible (pleasure) emotion of love."

John Paul II wrote of concupiscence as something bad, as being contrary to love. I've been tripped up several times by words with more than one meaning. Is this another instance of words (concupiscence/concupiscible and love) being used in different ways in different contexts?


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a very long time in the Catholic Church the word "concupiscible " emotions were without distinction and were considered if not bad at least dangerous.  More philosophically and objectively, they are simply the emotions associated with romantic love.  I think the the change in grammar to "concupiscence" might be significant in this case, that is, as a stage of just emotional or erotic interaction that does not transcend itself to the higher form of love needed for true friendship and marriage.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Create New...