Chris Perrin 23 Posted November 22, 2017 For those of you who have viewed the first part of the Teaching Math Classically course, or who have thought about "classical" math pedagogy, what is your emerging thought on what it means to teach math in accordance with the classical tradition of education? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites

Sarabeth Borowiec 3 Posted April 30, 2018 I have enjoyed listening through the beginning half of this course. It seems that ensuring that grammar, logic, and rhetoric are present throughout the whole length of the math curriculum is key. Giving children early experiences with mathematical concepts before they need to work with paper, pencil, and mathematical symbols is a way to draw them into mathematical conversations and thinking. Andrew gave great examples to show how to a teacher can help a child to grow in their understanding of "making" and "breaking" groups of numbers to help a child develop an tangible understanding of what place value is. My daughter (1st grade) was able to grasp multi-digit addition and subtraction more deeply after a few experiences of playing with groups in the way that Andrew demonstrated. In the classical tradition, students should sometimes move from theory to practice, but should also be challenged to move from practice (problem) to theory (or proof). Learning about what problems gave rise to these theorems and proofs provides a historical connection within the curriculum. The lecture about three proofs demonstrated an important point that students should be shown how mathematical proofs are beautiful, they were actually so clear and enjoyable that my daughters joined me in watching a few. While students at all stages may not be able to derive these proofs, they can follow that they are made logically, given that they have sufficient background in the subject. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites

Chris Perrin 23 Posted June 22, 2018 Thank you for this thoughtful post Sarabeth! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites

Lora Fanning 2 Posted June 24, 2018 While I'm only through with the first 6 or 7 lectures, teaching match classically seems to involve: Understanding the grammar, logic, rhetoric progression of learning and not being driven by a schedule or a curriculum, but letting understanding dictate our pace The goal of study is virtue, and this is no less true in Mathematics. A study of mathematics should lead to a love of how our world is ordered and a deeper appreciation of the mind of God. A study of mathematics offers as a benefit the ability to construct logical thoughts and to consider what tools we have at our disposal to solve a particular problem. When no tools are found suitable, we can then form our own tools from the ones we have or learn new approaches and techniques to solve a problem. I'm certain that teaching math classically means more than just this, but this is what I have discovered so far. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites

russelpolk 0 Posted January 4 Using the method described will also avoid the isolating of geometry to its own little world, not explored until many years down the road. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites